Efficiency of Hospital Information Management Systems: A Comparative Study between Teaching and Non-Teaching Hospitals
Keywords:
Hospital Information Systems, Teaching Hospitals, Non-Teaching Hospitals.Abstract
Background: Hospital Information Management Systems (HIMS) are pivotal in enhancing healthcare delivery by improving the efficiency of hospital operations. The effectiveness of these systems may vary significantly between different types of hospitals, influencing various aspects of healthcare management. Objectives: This study aims to compare the efficiency, user satisfaction, and integration of advanced features in HIMS between teaching and non-teaching hospitals. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 200 hospitals (100 teaching and 100 non-teaching). The study utilized standardized questionnaires to measure system efficiency, user satisfaction, and the extent of HIMS feature integration. Data analysis included calculating means, standard deviations, and conducting t-tests to compare the performance of HIMS between the two hospital groups. Results: Teaching hospitals demonstrated higher efficiency with a mean score of 80.3 (SD = 5.2) compared to 75.4 (SD = 5.0) in non-teaching hospitals (P < 0.001). Similarly, functionality and user satisfaction were higher in teaching hospitals (Mean = 84.3, SD = 9.6) than in non-teaching hospitals (Mean = 76.1, SD = 9.2), with significant statistical differences (P < 0.001). The integration of advanced features also showed a significant difference, with teaching hospitals scoring higher (Mean = 74.2, SD = 7.2) than non-teaching hospitals (Mean = 64.0, SD = 6.4). Conclusion: The study highlights that teaching hospitals tend to have more efficient, satisfactory, and advanced HIMS compared to non-teaching hospitals. These differences underscore the need for tailored strategies in the implementation and ongoing development of HIMS according to hospital type to maximize technological benefits.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.