Outcomes and Complications of Distal Femoral Fractures Treated with Retrograde Supracondylar Nailing Versus Locking Compression Plates: A Retrospective Review

Authors

  • Nizam Ahmed, Abdul Samad Qureshi, Vinod Kumar, Ahmar Ali, Waseem Ahmed, Faraz Khan

Keywords:

Distal femur fractures, retrograde supracondylar nail, locking compression plate, complications, fixation results.

Abstract

Background and Objective
A minor percentage of the fracture of the femur shaft is represented by distal femur fractures, but their treatment is still a technical challenge. The main methods of modern fixation are retrograde supracondylar nailing (RSN) and locking compression plate (LCP), the biomechanical benefits and restrictions of each being different. There is also continuing controversy over the patterns of complications with these two implants especially in complex distal third fractures.

References

Martinet O, Cordey J, Harder Y, Maier A, Bühler M, Barraud GE. The epidemiology of fractures of the distal femur. Injury. 2000;31 Suppl 3:C62‑3.

Kolb W, Guhlmann H, Windisch C, Marx F, Kolb K, Koller H. Fixation of distal femoral fractures with the Less Invasive Stabilization System: a minimally invasive treatment with locked fixed‑angle screws. Injury. 2009;40(7):723‑8.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-13

How to Cite

Nizam Ahmed, Abdul Samad Qureshi, Vinod Kumar, Ahmar Ali, Waseem Ahmed, Faraz Khan. (2026). Outcomes and Complications of Distal Femoral Fractures Treated with Retrograde Supracondylar Nailing Versus Locking Compression Plates: A Retrospective Review. International Journal of Pharmacy Research & Technology (IJPRT), 16(1), 1102–1115. Retrieved from https://ijprt.org/index.php/pub/article/view/1629

Issue

Section

Research Article