Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Prostatic Pathology and its Correlation with MRI wherever Required

Authors

  • Dr. Sushma Aharwal Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, S.S.H. N.S.C.B. Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
  • Dr. Vishal Singh Rathore Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, N.S.C.B. Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
  • Dr. Susan Abraham Ruram Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sukh Sagar Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
  • Dr. Barun Biswas Medical Officer, District Hospital, Umaria, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Keywords:

Prostatomegaly Prostatitis, Prostatic Calcification, Prostatic Abscess, Prostatic Carcinoma, Urinary Bladder, LUT etc.

Abstract

Background: The prostate glands the largest accessory gland of the male reproductive system. In adults, it typically weighs ~40 grams and has an average size of 3 x 4 x 2 cm [1]. On imaging, the upper limit of normal is considered to be 30 mL.[2] The prostate comprises 70% glandular tissue and 30% fibromuscular or stromal tissue[3] and provides ~30% of the volume of seminal fluid. Ultrasound best assessed with transrectal ultrasound. Outer gland (central and peripheral zones) - uniform low echogenicity but usually more echogenic than the inner gland. [4, 5] The prostate is covered in a surface called the prostatic capsule or prostatic fascia. The most common types of prostate disease are benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostatitis and prostate cancer (PCa).

Objective: To evaluate the prostatic pathology by transabdominal ultrasound, Transrectal ultrasound (whenever required) and corelate the all these findings with MRI.

Methods: Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms, were selected for study. A thorough case history was taken followed by Ultrasonography / MRI examination of pelvis. The study was conducted in the department of Radiodiagnosis at N.S.C.B. Medical College Jabalpur.

Result: Among 100 patients most patients were more than 60yrs of age. It was found that maximum cases 56% showed prostatic hypertrophy, 36% had prostatic calcification, 1% had prostatic carcinoma, 5%had prostatitis and 2% had prostatic abscess. On MRI 9% cases showed PI-RADS category 1, 4% were normal, 3% showed blooming artifact, 2% were hyperintense on T2 and 5% had Ca Prostate.

Conclusion: Our research study advocates that ultrasound is a simple, widespread available and a sensitive modality that can be advocated as the imaging investigation for diagnosing various prostatic pathologies. And MRI is recommended for a more precise diagnosis of prostate pathology.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-13

How to Cite

Dr. Sushma Aharwal, Dr. Vishal Singh Rathore, Dr. Susan Abraham Ruram, & Dr. Barun Biswas. (2026). Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Prostatic Pathology and its Correlation with MRI wherever Required. International Journal of Pharmacy Research & Technology (IJPRT), 16(1), 2473–2479. Retrieved from https://ijprt.org/index.php/pub/article/view/1899

Issue

Section

Research Article