Effectiveness of Small Group Discussion, Seminar and Self-Directed Learning in Teaching Biochemistry at Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, South India

Authors

  • Dr. Sajeevan K.C. Professor & HOD, Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College (GMC), Thrissur, Kerala, India.
  • Dr. Shajee S. Nair Professor & HOD, Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College (GMC), Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
  • Dr. Rejitha Ramachandran Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College (GMC), Paripilly, Kollam, Kerala, India.
  • Dr. Sujina C.M. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College (GMC), Manjeri, Kerala, India.
  • Dr. V. Sindhu Priya K. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College (GMC), Manjeri, Kerala, India.
  • Mr. Athil M. MBBS Student, Government Medical College (GMC), Manjeri, Kerala, India.
  • Ms. Fathima Hiba V.P MBBS Student, Government Medical College (GMC), Manjeri, Kerala, India.
  • Mr. Rahul A.S. MBBS Student, Government Medical College (GMC), Manjeri, Kerala, India.

Keywords:

Competency-based medical education; Biochemistry; Medical education; Self-directed learning; Small-group discussion; Seminar; Undergraduate medical students.

Abstract

Background: Competency-based medical education (CBME) emphasises learner-centred teaching–learning strategies that promote active participation, critical thinking, and lifelong learning. Small-group discussion (SGD), seminar, and self-directed learning (SDL) are commonly employed approaches in undergraduate medical education; however, comparative evidence regarding their effectiveness in biochemistry remains limited.

Methods: A comparative study was conducted among 110 Phase I MBBS students of the 2023 batch at Government Medical College, Manjeri, from March to September 2024. Three biochemistry topics—calcium, iron, and copper metabolism—were taught using SGD, seminar, and SDL in a rotational arrangement across three student batches. Knowledge acquisition was assessed using pre-tests and post-tests. Student perceptions were evaluated using a ten-item questionnaire with a 0–10 rating scale

Results: The median pre-test score was 5 for all three methods, with no significant difference between them (p = 0.360). Median post-test scores were 8 for SGD, 8 for seminar, and 9 for SDL; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.461). SDL received higher ratings for coverage of learning objectives, clarity of concepts, emphasis on important aspects, logical organisation, examination-note preparation, and motivation for further reading, critical thinking, and interest in the subject.

Conclusions: Self-directed learning was the most preferred method and received higher student-perception ratings across most educational domains. However, knowledge outcomes did not differ significantly among self-directed learning, small-group discussion, and seminar. All three methods can therefore be incorporated into undergraduate biochemistry teaching, with self-directed learning offering an advantage in learner acceptability and perceived educational value.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-27

How to Cite

Dr. Sajeevan K.C., Dr. Shajee S. Nair, Dr. Rejitha Ramachandran, Dr. Sujina C.M., Dr. V. Sindhu Priya K., Mr. Athil M., Ms. Fathima Hiba V.P, & Mr. Rahul A.S. (2026). Effectiveness of Small Group Discussion, Seminar and Self-Directed Learning in Teaching Biochemistry at Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, South India. International Journal of Pharmacy Research & Technology (IJPRT), 16(2), 7274–7280. Retrieved from https://ijprt.org/index.php/pub/article/view/3473

Issue

Section

Research Article