Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability in Spinal versus General Anesthesia  During Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Marriam Bilal, Muhammad Kashan Siddiqui, Ghazia Raza, Arslan Saleem, Mahmood Ahmad Zahid, Maria Aslam

Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability in Spinal versus General Anesthesia During Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Authors

Marriam Bilal, Muhammad Kashan Siddiqui, Ghazia Raza, Arslan Saleem, Mahmood Ahmad Zahid, Maria Aslam

Keywords:

spinal anesthesia; general anesthesia; hemodynamic stability.

Abstract

Lower abdominal surgeries are commonly performed under either spinal anesthesia (SA) orgeneral anesthesia (GA), yet comparative data regarding intraoperative hemodynamic stabilityremain limited. In this randomized controlled study, 160 patients undergoing elective lowerabdominal procedures were allocated to receive SA with 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine or GAwith propofol-remifentanil maintenance. Primary endpoints included intraoperative mean arterial

References

Salem Al-Khikani HAJ. Reduced BP variability in hernia repair: SA vs. GA. Clin Surg Group. 2025;14(5):301–306. (ClinSurge Group)

Adnan Kadhim AA et al. SA maintains HR and BP stability in hernia repair. WJ Med Case Rep. 2024;5(2):27–32. (Science Publishing Group)

Downloads

Published

2025-07-28

How to Cite

Marriam Bilal, Muhammad Kashan Siddiqui, Ghazia Raza, Arslan Saleem, Mahmood Ahmad Zahid, Maria Aslam. (2025). Comparison of Hemodynamic Stability in Spinal versus General Anesthesia During Lower Abdominal Surgeries . International Journal of Pharmacy Research & Technology (IJPRT), 15(2), 851–857. Retrieved from https://ijprt.org/index.php/pub/article/view/789