Traditional Versus Technology-Enhanced Demonstrations in Competency-Based Medical Education

Authors

  • Dr. Sharadkumar Pralhad Sawant Department of Anatomy, Prince Medical College, Sikar, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Rajasthan, India.
  • Dr. Nikita Jakhar Senior Resident Department of Pharmacology, KM Medical College and Hospital, Mathura (UP).
  • Dr. Amit Manchanda Department of Anatomy, Prince Medical College, Sikar, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Rajasthan, India.
  • Dr. Shaheen Rizvi Department of Anatomy, Geetanjali Medical College, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
  • Dr. Priyatama Sharadkumar Sawant Department of Ayush, Prince Hospital, Sikar, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Rajasthan, India.
  • Viren Sharadkumar Sawant Volgograd University Medical College, Russia.

Keywords:

Anatomy Education, Competency-Based Medical Education, Cadaveric Dissection, Technology-Enhanced Learning, Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Three-Dimensional Modelling, Artificial Intelligence, Medical Students.

Abstract

Background: Anatomical demonstration is a fundamental component of undergraduate medical education and provides the bridge between theoretical knowledge and clinical application. Cadaveric dissection, prosection, anatomical specimens, models, charts, and microscopy have traditionally formed the core of anatomy teaching. However, increasing student numbers, limited cadaver resources, reduced teaching time, and the need for clinically integrated learning have encouraged the adoption of technology-enhanced approaches.

Objective: This narrative review compares traditional and technology-enhanced methods of anatomical demonstration within the framework of Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) and examines their educational strengths, limitations, and potential for integration.

Materials and Methods: Recent literature concerning cadaveric teaching, three-dimensional models, virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), three-dimensional printing, virtual dissection, simulation, and artificial intelligence (AI) in anatomy education was reviewed. Evidence from recent comparative studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses was synthesized according to visualization, knowledge acquisition, spatial understanding, learner engagement, retention, clinical integration, and competency development.

Results: Traditional demonstrations provide authentic three-dimensional and tactile experiences, appreciation of anatomical variation, professional development, teamwork, and ethical engagement with body donors. Technology-enhanced approaches provide interactive visualization, repeatable demonstrations, individualized learning, radiological correlation, and simulation-based practice. Recent evidence indicates that VR and other immersive technologies can improve anatomy learning, particularly when used as complementary rather than replacement strategies.

Conclusion: Traditional and technology-enhanced demonstrations have complementary educational strengths. A blended model integrating cadaveric experience with validated digital technologies, simulation, and appropriately supervised AI is likely to provide the most effective framework for competency-oriented anatomy education.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-19

How to Cite

Dr. Sharadkumar Pralhad Sawant, Dr. Nikita Jakhar, Dr. Amit Manchanda, Dr. Shaheen Rizvi, Dr. Priyatama Sharadkumar Sawant, & Viren Sharadkumar Sawant. (2026). Traditional Versus Technology-Enhanced Demonstrations in Competency-Based Medical Education. International Journal of Pharmacy Research & Technology (IJPRT), 16(2), 3095–3101. Retrieved from https://ijprt.org/index.php/pub/article/view/2817

Issue

Section

Research Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)